We thought that it was revolution, therefore we became the
Revolutionaries. Bat they only played "7-40". There were
drunken brawl instead of revolution, pigsty instead of
Gang of revolutionaries sits in a cellar and takes offence. At
whom? At revolution?
You made sacrifices to capture Bastille? It has been destroyed
two hundred years ago.
You whistled and they didn't dance. You sang sad songs and
they didn't cry. As the generals prepare for the pas wars, so
the revolutionaries get themselves ready for the past
revolutions. What did you wait for? Revolt of the masses?
But the sense of the past is that there will be no past.
Because the situation has ceased to keep within your notions,
including your boring notions about revolution and because you
have stopped having presentiment testifies not of termination
of revolution, but, at last, of its possibility for you. It
begins only right now.
The revolution as an overthrow is only in case of the
overthrow of all notions about revolution, existing till this
"There will be no past!" - it says. Here its horror! All warm
and convenient nestles in the past and the future looks with
cold eyes, draught and cold. Revolutionary is the first, who
is given a slap in the face from it. It's not always such,
which was dreamed during seances of juvenile masturbation.
The Christianity won not over the Satan and built not the
Heaven. The victory of proletarian revolution not necessarily
meant victory of the working class. The French revolutionaries
wanted to put on togas, but the French revolution didn't
manage to be covered with toga.
It's impossible to profit from revolution, because it was
wasteful. It doesn't feed its adherents. It doesn't feed the
masses. Posing a question about benefits of revolution for
people is senseless. The revolution is boon itself, it's
senseless to expect the weal after it.
- But there is no revolutionary situation!
- It is in our hearts.
- But the Russian don't assault upon us!
- Then we will assault upon the Russians.
- But the people do not want freedom!
- Well, then we shall not free them.
We are weak in that measure/ in which we adhere our old
notions and notions about us. We lose whether we are
"left-wing" or "right-wing", "conservatives" or "radicals",
eventually even if we are revolutionaries. We are weak, if we
like their restaurants, their thing, there schemes, and
especially, if we are liked by them.
There are two spheres influencing on vital stream but looming
above it - scientific and technical progress and global
financial regularities, as grand natural cataclysms, that
occur, but remain always outside of the consciousness during
its contemplation's concerning of the own destiny.
Scientific and technical progress each time carries out
setting of new data regarding next played historical
situation. And if we consider sense of all this deformity just
in aesthetic achievement of collisions, if in scenical we
search for maximum, then we will agree, that the paces of
scientific and technical development irritate a little. It's
bearable, when rules of the game change for each new set, but
when they change in a course of the set, culmination becomes
Someone makes the history, someone makes the science and they
hamper each other.
The revolution has two ways: either society, which orientates
itself towards producing of achievements instead of goods,
will be created, or we will organize riot, which makes
impossible concentration of efforts and resources on the
science and technology.
It's unclear, what way is more bloody, though main scientific
schools of the world are based on so small number of people,
that elimination (or voluntary refusal) of the several
thousands would delay scientific progress immediately and,
probably, would result in vivifying degradation. In connection
with virtual disposition of research centers, the struggle
against imperialism simultaneously is the struggle against
paces of scientific and technical progress.
Advanced countries try to realize the first way, but the full
transition to it, even in America and Japan, will require
revolutionary changes and will result in great upheavals.
The second way exites soul of the existant. Would horses
really gallop over the steppe?
According to whole complex of signs the end of the nineteenth
century differs from its beginning more, than end from
beginning of the twentieth. It specifies deceleration of paces
of the scientific and technical progress.
Economics is, when someone went to USA, bought, brought,
sold and profited. But if it is emission of shares and stocks of International Monetary Fund, then it's mysticism, instead of economics.
The game at small nuances of thousands of rules, on relations
and authorizations probably concerns production, but, in
general, is self-sufficient. The profit is gotten from air.
The legal consequences of the primary arrangements and
compromises, due to which the society is kept, are too
ramified and numerous, they lead too far, that in a whole
enable us to speak about estrangement of fruits from trees.
The exploitation exist as the independent subject and dim
faces of exploiters are present as something casual in its
Hundred dollars hidden in a box are real value. All mass of
dollars in the world is conditionality, concerning which is
impossible to fancy, that it will be used as purchasing means.
The money functions as something except money.
The Roman world was based upon legions, this world is based
upon shares and stocks, which, with development of computer
technology, lose even the physical essence of a paper. The
ideal essence they have lost even earlier. They meant physical
capital so long before, that it already has become a lie. The
banks hide and turn over emptiness. The production of
emptiness is as necessary for the world economics, as
production of energy.
Domination of the alienated forms determines nowadays.
Forms, which not necessarily need understanding, and alone
thing, you have to know, is orientation yourself by them.
Lawyer - miserable creature, priest of the emptiness, person,
who "is oriented", is superior to princes and leaders and
judges overflow of the life. Therefore only among completed
criminals we look for the future, in their odd
tattoos-revelations and treacherous eyes we seek for truth of
the next day.
If you are said: "This is a philosopher", ask, in what jail he
was imprisoned? If you are said: "This is a poet", ask, where
he was at war?
It doesn't mean, that only the prison wisdom and poetics of
war are meaningful. But WHAT can human being know about
substance, if he never violated the penal code? HOW to feel
depth of love, not hiding from mine-thrower firing?
Reflections of the predecessors are alienated. It is possible
to grasp them only in one place - at a frontier.
The lawyer and operator of computer - who was nothing, that
has come everywhere. Spengler has died, not having played with
computer - what symbol wasn't used with effect!
No matter, what is talked about thermonuclear synthesis. Only
three things are the symbol of epoch - computer, credit card
and penal code. With them forms of alienation alienate the
person. The human being is presented in the system as the
quantitative factor. Community is needless. The presence of
the outstanding features are dangerous.
The future revolution will be revolution of communities. It
will face two ways:
- destruction of the social machinery and its attributes;
- destruction of the social machinery and creation of
community of revelation, which will be able to digest
technical means of alienation into means of integration.
The nation is born through accurate shot. It is senseless to
look for reasons of the American prosperity in its tax
legislation. One should search for them in secret sources of
the life, in brief, nobody knows, where to seek for them. The
archetype of culture cannot be expressed discursively. It is
leap, jumping over the conglomeration of alienated forms and
The social machinery was invented far before the first
machines. It works precisely in the same way. Also it is
necessary and it irritates too.
The alienated forms, the administrative and financial
mechanisms are self-sufficient and gravitate. In the
revolution they are resisted by desire to take part in history
and this is an aesthetic desire. Desire to head history.
Desire to leap. Existant is born from time to time, who poses
the question, why not me but these obese guys wearing suits
and mechanisms solve everything here?
Certainly, the archetype is negation. Technological progress
isn't revolution any longer, it's inertia. The suppression of
technological counter-revolution can be carried out as
antitechnological revolution, or as revolution of communities.
Communities must undermine the society.
Community isn't the form of organization, it is existence,
intense being. In some measure community always is integrated
person. The revolution must consist in that community should
become integrated person FIRST OF ALL.
The integrated person can overcome the technological progress
as alienated form, and, at last, engulf it.
So, the separate person can surmount alienation either through
destruction, or through revelation.
We talk about actualization of the communal and birth of the
community with a higher level of integration. It will result
in the destruction of many alienated forms, destruction of the
estrangement of some forms, entire demolition of the social
machinery, because social machinery crashes communities.
Body is formed by the function, community is formed by the
Communities preceded the society. After society had occurred,
they were in complex terms of mutual destruction and
conception with it. The nations, that have appeared in the
European revolutions, were communities of the new quality but
also were resisted by the new degree of alienation of the
public forms. The new quality implies that the nations
represented universal communities.
Existant is opposed to the public machinery. What community
will break the forms of alienation?
At schools and universities we were stuffed by force with the
refined theory of revolution having being written by
outstanding revolutionary practicians. Nobody has learned
nothing. The knowledge should be secret just to take
possession of the masses.
One of the central issues was concept about "revolutionary
situation". It was meant that the revolution occurred as an
Our revolution will come true in conditions of the
counter-revolutionary situation. Future revolution will be
challenge, not reply. This revolution will be called purely by
ideal reasons, abstractions and nostalgia, there will be no
causes except mentioned above. It will be "from couture" just
in sense of the own impracticality.
Bookshelves are filled with our weapons. Books are mines that
will blast next generations. When somebody speaks about
"spirituality", they think he implies cornflowers, but in fact
it is fire. The priority of spiritual is disorder and
lawlessness. Only God knows, where idealist will be led by his
abstraction, but usually it leads to the radical negation and
refusal. The abstraction is aggressive.
They pray and respect the Christianity but even priest will
not endure a long conversation with true Christian (Voltaire
European intellectuals of the first half of XX century, who
were interested in Nietzsche, howled as pigs, when iron column
of his adherents entered their flaming cities. And what did
Zarathustra tell them?
People kill and for home reasons, but the wars are waged for When you speak about spirituality, draw a head in shoulders.
the sake of abstraction.
Any philosophy usually ends with Chemistry.